<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The North Coast News &#187; 2010 &#187; January &#187; 26</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northcoastnews.com/2010/01/26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northcoastnews.com</link>
	<description>Serving all the communities of the North Beach since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 03:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sorry, Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.northcoastnews.com/2010/01/26/sorry-rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northcoastnews.com/2010/01/26/sorry-rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Scanlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Coast News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northcoastnews.com/?p=6543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this week&#8217;s North Coast News, there is Part II of Rich McEachin&#8217;s answers, regarding 2007 spending, contracts etc., as well as McEachin rebutting Creighton, and Creighton rebutting McEachin.
Unfortunately, due to some weird technology glitch on Page 4, this photo appeared

	
	bob wave web

where this should have been:

	
	McEachin bw web

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northcoastnews.com/2010/01/26/sorry-rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed limits = staying the same</title>
		<link>http://www.northcoastnews.com/2010/01/26/speed-limits-staying-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northcoastnews.com/2010/01/26/speed-limits-staying-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Scanlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Coast News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northcoastnews.com/?p=6540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite Don Scott&#8217;s 500+ signature petition to repeal the lowered speed limits of 2009, City Council isn&#8217;t budging, for now at least. By a &#8220;consensus,&#8221; they agreed to look at the issue again . . . but not until August.
Would you:
a) keep speed limits where they are now
b) raise speed limits to pre-Summer of 2009 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northcoastnews.com/2010/01/26/speed-limits-staying-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

